E. Ablorh-Odjidja, Ghanadot
The Mo Ibrahim award, in reality, is the culmination of African
political leadership games. Call it the African Political
Olympics or The World Cup. Unlike the eleven players that
represented Ghana for the recent U20 world cup, this contest
demands only one selected contestant from a country.
Ghana’s contestant was former President J. A. Kufuor.
Indications before the winner was to be announced showed that he
was the stronger candidate. For some reason, no winner was
declared this year.
It was Kufuor’s prestige, his achievements in office, his impact
as a leader and example for job well done that was under
scrutiny. The same went for other worthy contestants like Thabo
Mbeki of South Africa and Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria.
What were Kufuor’s chances for winning the Ibrahim Award?
Plenty, except for the background noises emanating from Ghana
during the Prize Committee’s deliberations.
For some in Ghana, the prize was seen as a show to benefit just
one person, Kufuor, and never as one that ultimately would have
benefited the entire country. Therefore, a convenient backdrop
to display discontent was created while the deliberations went
on.
The backdrop was to show the world how undeserving Kufuor was
for the prize by helping to seed doubts in the minds of the
Prize Committee; or apprehensions about the nature of his
office. Other fortuitous events also helped.
The case of the M & J scandal was the fortuitous one. It could
have given pause to any Prize Committee formed to give a
Ghanaian official an award this year. And the reason being that
it established the unfortunate idea that Ghanaian officials were
not above corruption.
Ironically, the M & J case had nothing to do with Kufuor. It was
entirely an NDC government problem, but the resonance could have
affected Kufuor’s chances all the same.
Note that a committee considering to
pin an award on a Ghanaian official, in this case a president, in the midst of the
M & J scandal, would hesitate
to do so
because the temptation to ask “what next?” would be
too strong.
The same thinking could have affected the medal chances of Mbeki
and Obasanjo. There were rumors of
corruption in both Nigeria and South Africa just as there
was in Ghana. But one needs only to
know that these two presidents were succeeded in government by
members of their own parties. As such, the likelihood that
fellow party members will pursue relentlessly corruption charges
against them was very remote.
Yet Obasanjop and Mbeki also missed the award too; which makes
the assumption that Kufuor could have
won the prize even stronger, were it not for the uniqueness of
the political situation at home.
In Ghana, the opposition party, the NDC, succeeded Kufuor’s NPP
and has so far shown the willingness and the anxiousness to
bring Kufuour’s reputation down. The Ibrahim Award would have
run contrary to this ambition.
For example, there is the atmosphere
created by the Ghana@50 Secretariat hearings. The suspicion from
NDC quarters was that a lot of money
was squandered by this secretariat set up by the Kufuor’s
administration to administer the 50th year anniversary of
Ghana’s independence.
Just last week, the Chief Executive of the secretariat, Dr.
Wireko-Brobbey, showed up to explain his end of the business.
Surprisingly, the Ghana@50 enterprise made profit,
according to Dr. Wereko-Brobbey. He stated a huge cash profit
for the event; something historically uncommon for government
established enterprises in Ghana.
The response the public should have heard following Dr,
Wereko-Brobbey is yet to come. But to declare boldly and
publicly that an enterprise made profit should always be
tangible and a verifiable proposition and on
the basis of the Secretariat’s balance sheet, which ought to
have been seen or demanded for by the Ghana@50 inquiry team long
before the chief executive came to the witness stand.
Did the Ghana@50 secretariat show profit or not? If not, then
the commission could continue with the process to find where the
proceeds went. Otherwise, the commission is morally bound to
acknowledge Dr. Wereko-Brobbey statement as correct and to
congratulate the officials of the Ghana@50 secretariat for job
well done; rather than to continue with the inquiry and hope to
find an incidental chance to ruin a reputation.
Another NPP government act under inquiry in Ghana while the Mo
Ibrahim Prize was being considered was the Vodafone deal with
Ghanatelecom.
According to an expert, the value of Ghanatelecom
in 2004 was $400
million US Dollars, set by a competent financial organization,
ECOBANK. In 2007, the Kufuor administration sold
part of the shares of Ghanatelecom to Vodafone for $900 million US Dollars.
The problem in a nutshell for the NDC
government was why Ghanatelecom should
be sold for $900 million when there was an offer to purchase
it for $1.2 billion US Dollars. The
omission, to them,
meant that there was some underhand deal
between buyer and officials of the NPP administration.
Forgotten in the NDC calculation for corruption was the issue of
competence to run a national asset such as Ghanatelecom,
in the delivery of critical public service like
telecommunications for the benefit of
the entire population of Ghana. In
such cases, the highest bidder need
not necessarily win.
Also forgotten in the investigation
was the case of Malaysia Telecom’s purchase of the same
Ghanatelecom during the NDC administration of the 90s. For the
lesser amount of $150 million, Malaysia Telecom had Ghanatelecom
only to run it poorly for lack of competence.
Inquiries to all these facets of the Kufuor administration
continued relentlessly while the Mo Ibrahim Award was being
considered. And there was not a single word of encouragement or
support from the NDC government for Kufuor. By October 15, 2009,
The Vodafone Commission
report had been released by the Ghana government;
strategically timed before the announcement of the
Ibrahim Award. Under these circumstances of mistrust and
uncertainty who would now doubt the
outcome?
To understand how difficult it must have been for Kufuor to win
the award this time, one must go back to the imagery of the U20
World Cup final with Brazil, and the penalty of the red card
handed to one of our players. Then consider the Mo Ibrahim award
as a soccer match with the current administration of Ghana
giving our player, Kufuor, yellow cards, if not red ones.
Kufuor may yet win the Ibrahim Award since he has two years left
for consideration. But the question is will these relentless
investigations of his administration ever stop?