nd |
Anatomy of Misery
How did Sudan implode so catastrophically?
By GEORGE AYITTEY
The Wall Street Journal, Thursday, August 12, 2010
Peace has eluded Sudan since its inception in 1956.
Sudan was technically the first sub-Saharan African
country to gain independence from a colonial power,
but it immediately descended into civil war, so that
Ghana became, for the world at large, the first true
post-colonial African state. Britain, upon leaving
Sudan, intended to create a separate southern state,
to serve as a bulwark against the Islamic north's
expansionist tendencies. But Britain dithered and
finally threw the south in with the north to form a
unitary state.
Immediately the Christian south rebelled against the
imposition of Islamic rule by the northern Arabs.
The ensuing civil war—ignored by the rest of the
world—went on for decades, claiming more than four
million lives. And just as a peace deal seemed
imminent, in 2004, war erupted in Sudan's western
region of Darfur, resulting in a humanitarian
disaster—so far, more than a million dead and three
million displaced. Amid the chaos, Sudan has
intermittently served as a home for radical
Islamists, including Osama bin Laden.
Part of the problem is Sudan's wobbly version of
democracy. The country has been led by weak
coalition governments often vulnerable to strongman
takeovers. In 1985, Gen. Jafar Numeiri, who had
installed himself through a coup, was himself
ousted, in part because of a food crisis that
claimed 90,000 lives. Another coalition government
was then formed, by the Umma Party and the
Democratic Unionist Party. But it proved unworkable
and was shoved aside in a coup led by Sudan's
current president, Omar al-Bashir. His brutal regime
and Arab militia—the janjaweed— decimates villages,
rapes women, poisons wells and enslaves blacks. Mr.
Bashir has been indicted by the International
Criminal Court for crimes against humanity.
In "Sudan," Richard Cockett, who served for five
years as Africa editor for the Economist magazine,
hopes to explain "how Sudan came to implode so
catastrophically, and to suggest what the often
well- intentioned foreigners who tried to help the
country can learn from their collective failure to
do much about it." He does so brilliantly in a book
that is well- researched, beautifully written and
thoroughly absorbing, despite the wrenching
tragedies it must chronicle.
As Mr. Cockett makes clear, there is plenty of blame
to go around for Sudan's fate, including "meddling
Western politicians, over-simplifying activists,
spineless African leaders, shamefully silent Muslim
countries, land-greedy Arab tribes, myopic Sudanese
politicians." Upon gaining independence, Sudan
decided to retain the British model of governance—a
unitary system that centralized power and
decision-making. But the government in Khartoum,
Sudan's capital, was often too weak to rule the
country's vast territory, which fell prey to the
machinations of neighbors—Egypt, Ethiopia and Libya,
among others.
Eventually more distant and powerful countries
became involved in Sudan's affairs, not least the
U.S. in its hunt for terrorists. (Remember that a
Sudanese pharmaceutical factory was mistakenly
bombed by the U.S. in 1998 in retaliation for the
bombing of American embassies in Kenya and
Tanzania.) China's role, in recent years, has been
callously commercial: pumping oil in the south and
blocking United Nations resolutions that would
sanction Mr. Bashir's government.
The main culprits, according to Mr. Cockett, have
been the members of Sudan's squabbling political
class. In their "politicking," Mr. Cockett says,
they have pursued narrow sectarian interests and
maneuvered to gain political advantage, oblivious of
the crises facing the country and the need for a
sound democratic order. In 1983, Khartoum announced
the imposition of sharia law on the entire country,
prompting a rebellion in the south.
Even as revenues from Sudan's abundant natural
resources flow into central-government coffers,
Khartoum has imposed a tax, called diynia, on
horses, camels, cows, donkeys and sheep. The
residents of Darfur, now so desperate for help,
complain that they get nothing in return from the
government for this tax, by way of social services
or development. The Beja tribespeople in the east
make the same complaint. Little wonder that the
country's citizens are both rebellious and poor.
Mr. Cockett is not happy with human-rights activists
in the West, however well-intentioned they may be as
they try to respond to Sudan's troubled conditions.
He believes that, too often, Western activists have
falsely raised the expectations of the Darfuri
rebels, and they use the term "genocide" to describe
Darfur's disaster—a term that, Mr. Cockett believes,
should be applied more restrictively. In Darfur, he
sees a "bungled counter- insurgency operation that
got wildly out of hand and ended up as ethnic
cleansing." Not everyone will agree with this
description. In any case, Mr. Cockett's conclusion
is unsettling. "The Khartoum government has already
won the battle," he says. "If the intention had
always been to remove the African tribes from their
traditional lands in Darfur, then they have largely
succeeded."
In a gallant effort to find an "African solution"
for Sudan's crises, Mr. Cockett points to Nigeria's
federal system as a model. A true federal system,
like that of the U.S., would indeed decentralize
power; but Nigeria's is a fake federal system, which
rebel groups in the Niger Delta are fighting against
for the same reasons that the Darfuris and the Beja
tribespeople oppose Khartoum. Perhaps the vehicle
used to dismantle apartheid in South Africa would be
more appropriate, since at the core of Sudan's
problems is Arab apartheid.
But then again, why fault Mr. Cockett for not
finding a solution when the mother of all "African
solutions"—the African Union—has proved so
ineffectual? It sent peacekeepers into Darfur. But
when they came under sustained rebel attack on their
base, in October 2007, they did what "peacekeepers"
do in such circumstances—they fled!
Mr. Ayittey, the author of "Africa Unchained," is
the head of the Free Africa Foundation in
Washington.
|